[quote=""Olorin""]Well, I think the ultimate example of someone totally becoming their role is, oddly enough, the actor PJ allegedly wanted to play Aragorn—Daniel Day Lewis. He's legendary that way.
On another note, here are a couple of views from the Digital Bits about the effectiveness of 3D and HFR in The Hobbit:
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/columns/t ... into-speed
The take-home is that the quality of what you saw might vary greatly from theater to theater, not only due to the type of 3D they were using and whether or not it was HFR, but also due to how well the theater was projecting the film.
I saw it twice: IMAX 3D and regular 2D, 24 fps both times. I did not find the 3D to be all that great. Certainly, it was not Avatar- or Prometheus-quality. Some of this may be due to where and how I saw it, but the article also points out what a steep learning curve the production had, taking on not only 3D and HFR but also having post-production being very rushed, with re-editing required at the last minute to refashion the film from 1/2 of a saga to 1/3 of a saga.[/quote]
I saw it in HFR 3D Imax first, the same theater I saw Prometheus and Avatar in. The 3D depth was as good, or better than those two films, and nothing looked "flat", except a few early scenes in Bag End, so a completely different e xp erience than this guy.
My only complaint was the Imax sound mix, which requires a special mix for their speaker system. Many of the subtle sound effects were simply too loud, and the music mix was not balanced very well with everything else. The mix for my 24 fps viewing was far better.
Also, I think this guy is dead wrong about saying there was rushed editing at the last minute when it was announced to be three films. As I understand it, that was in the works about six months prior to the release, and if anything, it actually meant less editing and effect work to be completed. They simply ended one beat earlier by making the forest battle the end point instead of the barrel ride.